Bad Parallel Violation Decision, But Plaintiff May Have Nowhere to Go

When we first read Steiden v. Genzyme BioSurgery, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99689 (July 18, 2012), we didn’t know which bothered us ..

Join Now
Already a Member? Log In to Your Account
Home My Account Directories    
Blog Directory
Web Directory
Articles Directory
Search
Users

Home > Blog Directory > Drug and Device Law



Bad Parallel Violation Decision, But Plaintiff May Have Nowhere to Go

Published on 2012-07-23 18:13:00

When we first read Steiden v. Genzyme BioSurgery, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99689 (July 18, 2012), we didn’t know which bothered us more: the court’s parallel violation ruling or its TwIqbal ruling.

read more: Bad Parallel Violation Decision, But Plaintiff May Have Nowhere to Go

  Other Posts
Plaintiffs Discover Risks of Refusing to Participate in Predictive Coding Discovery
A Not So Bad Blast from The Past
Polett To Be Reargued En Banc
Publisher Liability Rejected By Philadelphia C.P. Court
Mark Marcum Down as a Not-So-Good Case on Preemption and TwIqbal
Third Circuit Calls on Preemption to Oust New Jersey Food Claims
Indiana’s “Government Compliance” Presumption Against Defect and Negligence
Interesting Consumer Protection Twist
Big Sky Beat Down
Deposition Lojinks
© 2006-2013 OnToplist.com, All Rights Reserved
Online Marketing